Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
-
Más información
![]()
71% -
Más información
![]()
75% -
Más información
![]()
54% -
Más información
![]()
33%
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
Conductor
Asiento trasero
Asiento delantero
Vehículo
Mástil
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad| Posición del asiento | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
| Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Impacto en cabeza 13,6 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 0,0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
| Nombre del sistema | ESP | |
| Comportamiento | ||
| Se aplica a | Not available | ||
| Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
| Visual | |
 |
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is fitted as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver's seat but is not available for the passenger seat so the system was not rewarded. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option. As it is fitted to most cars sold, it was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. Neither lane assist nor autonomous emergency braking are available.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 4 door sedan
Año de fabricación 2014
Peso en vacío 1044kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - applies to all Peugeot 301s of the specification listed
Clase Familiar pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
Instalado en el vehículo como opción![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible![]()
No aplicable
Instalado en el vehículo como opciónVídeos
Validez de la valoración
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
The Peugeot 301 is identical to the Citroën C-Elysée. Data provided by Peugeot-Citroën shows that the results of the tests done on the Citroën would apply also to the Peugeot 301. The comments below are based on tests done on the C-Elysée
Compartir
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good, except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.