- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente





- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
Forward movement of the 3 year old in the frontal test was not excessive. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 3,0 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 2,1 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The bonnet provided poor protection in all areas which might be struck by an adult's head. For a child's head, the protection offered was predominantly poor but was good in some areas towards the centre of the bonnet. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | ESP | |
Comportamiento |
Se aplica a | All seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Electronic stability control is fitted as standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder system for both front and rear seats. A speed limitation device is standard on some variants and optional on others.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Premios Advanced
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Peugeot 3008 1.6HDi, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2009
Peso en vacío 1425kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all 3008s of the specification tested
Clase Familiar pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Premios Advanced
Validez de la valoración
Revisiones anuales y modelos rediseñados









The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact and the protection offered to both driver and passenger was rated predominantly good. However, the passenger airbag was found to have been torn slightly during deployment, allowing it to vent in a way other than designed. Peugeot attributed the tear to incorrect splitting of the airbag cover in the dashboard and an improved design is now in production. Peugeot's tests indicated that the tear would not have influenced the characteristics of the airbag and that the protection offered was unaffected. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs and Peugeot showed that similar protection was provided to occupants of different sizes or those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier impact but protection of the chest was marginal in the side pole test. Protection against whiplash injuries was also marginal, the car scoring no points in the most severe of the three whiplash tests.