- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & Easyfix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection was rated as good for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies, and maximum points were scored in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Optional i-Size anchorages are available for the front passenger seat. All of the child restraints for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 16,0 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 3,5 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 5,1 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Active Emergency Braking system | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 8 km/h | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Función de frenado automático |
-
Ciclista en el lado izquierdo, vista obstaculizada
-
Ciclista cruzando la carretera
-
Ciclista moviéndose en la misma dirección
The protection offers to the head of struck pedestrian was mostly good or adequate on the bonnet surface but was weak or poor along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered predominantly adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs but protection of the pelvis area was mixed. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system detects vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed adequately. In tests with a cyclist target, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Speed Assistance System |
Función de información de limitación de velocidad | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Función de control de velocidad | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Detección de ocupantes | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | Lane Keep Assist |
Tipo | LKA and ELK |
Operativo a partir de | 70 km/h |
Comportamiento | |
Permanencia de carril de emergencia | |
Permanencia de carril | |
Interfaz Hombre-maquina |
Nombre del sistema | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
Tipo | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 8 km/h | |||
Sensor utilizado | camera and radar |
A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats, but the car is not equipped with a system to monitor driver fatigue or impairment. Local speed limits are detected and the information provided to the driver who can then set the speed limiter appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path when it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations to prevent the car leaving the road, for example. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Renault Kangoo 1.3 Tce, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door MPV
Año de fabricación 2021
Peso en vacío 1531kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Townstars
Clase Pequeño monovolumen
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración


Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
The Nissan Townstar is, in all ways related to safety, identical to the Renault Kangoo tested by Euro NCAP. Accordingly, the rating of the Kangoo, published in 2021, can be applied also to the Nissan Townstar.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings demonstrated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger dummy. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver dummy’s chest was rated as marginal, based on measurements of compression during the test. Analysis of the deformable impact barrier after the test, and of decelerations of the trolley during the test, indicated that the vehicle would be quite a benign crash partner in collisions with other vehicles. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection was rated as good or adequate for all critical body regions, for both the front driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for all critical body areas and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was adequate and that of other body regions was good. An assessment of dummy excursion (the extent to which the dummy moves to the opposite side of the car in an impact from the far side), demonstrated poor performance. There is no counter-measure for occupant to occupant impacts in a side impact. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.