- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Izquierda con solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Sin solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Derecha con solape parcial
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In the frontal test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the Juke scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Juke is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 15,1 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 6,0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Función de frenado automático |
-
Ciclista cruzando la carretera
-
Ciclista moviéndose en la misma dirección
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with a few poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations, and the Juke scored maximum points in these tests. The Juke's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to cyclists was good and to pedestrians was adequate, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Speed Limiter/Traffic Sign Recognition |
Función de información de limitación de velocidad | Camera based |
Función de control de velocidad | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | All Seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Detección de ocupantes | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | Intelligent Lane Intervention (ILI) |
Tipo | LKA (including LDW) |
Operativo a partir de | 55 km/h |
Comportamiento | |
Permanencia de carril | |
Interfaz Hombre-maquina |
Nombre del sistema | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h | |||
Información adicional | Supplementary warning |
The Juke has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, as well as intervening more aggressively in some critical situations. The speed assistance system uses a camera to identify local speed limits. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the speed limiter as appropriate.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Nissan Juke, DIG-T 117, N-Connecta, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2019
Peso en vacío 1212kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Jukes, including hybrid
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Variante de la gama de modelos
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol hybrid** | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
** Additional tests performed




Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as adequate, with good protection of other parts of the body. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.