The EVeasy Limo, unavailable in Europe but sold in Turkey, is identical to the Mobilize Limo tested by Euro NCAP and has the same level of safety equipment.  Accordingly, the same level of safety would be expected from the EVeasy Limo.

The passenger compartment of the Limo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Inspection of the vehicle after the test revealed a rupture of the driver’s footwell.  A penalty was applied to the score and Mobilize were precluded from demonstrating good knee and femur protection to occupants of sizes other  than the dummies used, leading to a marginal rating for that body region.  Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Limo would be a somewhat aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, apart from the driver’s chest, protection of which was rated as marginal based on compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good but the test score was penalised as the door lock on the rear, impacted side was found to have released.  In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was rated as weak, based on rib compressions, but that of other critical body regions was good. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Limo has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s test, with good protection of occupants’ heads.  However, Mobilize could not demonstrate robust, symmetrical performance of the centre airbag and the score was penalised.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The Limo has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash.   The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of both the 6 and 10 year dummies in both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests.  However, the 6 year dummy was not fully restrained in the side impact, and the Limo lost points in this part of the assessment.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  However, the labelling of the switch does not meet Euro NCAP’s requirements for permanency. All of the restraint types for which the Limo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.

The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.  The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis region was also good or adequate at all test locations.  The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Limo can respond to vulnerable road users, as well as to other vehicles.  The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most scenarios.

The Limo’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats but the car does not have a system to detect driver fatigue.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  A speed assistance system detects the local speed limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately.