Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Mazda 2 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but dummy readings indicated high values of neck tension and marginally high readings for chest deceleration. The recommended child restraints could not be fitted for the side barrier impact as the front seats are positioned too far rearward. Mazda showed, using in-house side barrier tests, that the two child dummies are properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing dummy to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the types of child restraints for which the car is designed could be fitted and accommodated with the exception of the semi-universal group 0+/1 restraint which could not be installed in the rear behind the driver's seat.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 18,5 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 5,8 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrian's legs in all areas tested and scored maximum points. Protection provided to the pelvis area was predominantly good. The surface of the bonnet provided good protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of its surface, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Función de información de limitación de velocidad | N/A |
Función de advertencia | Manually set |
Función de limitación de velocidad | Manually set |
Comportamiento | ||
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 0% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 0% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.8 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Se aplica a | All seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | LDWS |
Tipo | Lane Departure Warning |
Advertencia | Audible & Visual |
Comportamiento | |
Prueba de confirmación de LDW
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment as is a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is an option but is expected to be fitted to most cars sold so was included in the assessment and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. Similarly, a lane departure warning system is available as an option and was rewarded in the assessment. There is no high speed (inter-urban) autonomous braking system available for the Mazda 2.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Mazda 2 1.5 'Core', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2015
Peso en vacío 1027kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Mazda 2's
Clase Segmento B
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración















Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment of the Mazda 2 remained stable in the frontal offset barrier test. In that test, maximum points were scored for the protection of the passenger dummy and only a fraction of a point was lost for the driver. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both front seat occupants and Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. In the full-width frontal test, good protection was provided to all body regions of the front seat passenger except the neck, protection of which was rated as marginal owing to the neck extension measured during the test. Protection of the rear seat passenger was rated as good or adequate for all body regions. Maximum points were scored in the side impact barrier test, with good protection of all critical body regions. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection was good and maximum points were scored. For the front seats and head restraints, tests indicated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision but a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor protection. A low-speed autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option for the Mazda 2. However, as it is not standard equipment, the system did not qualify for inclusion in the assessment.