Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | |||
---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | ||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
The Ypsilon scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ and 3 year dummies in the full-scale crash tests. Both child dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints. In the side barrier impact, both were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the lieklihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ypsilon is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 14,9 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 2,4 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection provided to pedestrians' legs, with good results at all test locations. Protection of the pelvic region was more mixed, results ranging from poor to good. Test results on the bonnet surface showed predominantly adequate or marginal protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded both along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Se aplica a | Front seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Ypsilon has electronic stability control as standard, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front seats. A reminder system for the rear seats is available as an option, so it did not qualify for assessment. The Ypsilon does not have autonomos emergency braking, speed assistance or a lane assistance system.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Lancia New Ypsilon 1.2 Gold, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2015
Peso en vacío 965kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Ypsilons of the specification tested
Clase Segmento B
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración












Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment of the Ypsilon remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Lancia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, no points were scored. For the driver, parameters relating to head injury and neck bending indicated poor protection for both of these parts of the body, and marginal protection of the chest. Protection of the rear passenger dummy was poor for all critical body areas except the neck, protection of which was rated as weak. However, in the side impact barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good, and maximum points were scored. A side pole test was not performed in this assessment. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection for the occupants of those seating positions. The Ypsilon does not have an autonomous emergency braking system to provide additional whiplash protection.
Note: Moments after the offset frontal barrier test, a fire started in the engine compartment, a consequence of the battery positive terminal shorting out and setting fire to brake fluid leaking from the reservoir. This is a rare occurrence: Lancia had not seen this phenomenon in any of their development tests and are not aware of any real-world cases. Nevertheless, the company has investigated the issue and are introducing a countermeasure into production in early December.