Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente





- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
In the frontal impact, the 3 year dummy did not move forward excessively. However, on rebound, the dummy's head contacted the trim on the rear door pillar and the car lost all points for protection of the 3 year dummy in that test. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled so a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position. The dangers of doing so are not clearly labelled in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 10,1 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 0,0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The bumper provided good protection in all areas tested and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor in all areas tested. In almost all areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet provided poor protection. However, protection provided to an adult's head was mixed with areas of good and poor protection.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Comportamiento | ||
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 128300% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 102200% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.85 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Se aplica a | Front seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Grand Cherokee and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the driver and front passenger seats. A sped limitation device is not offered on the Grand Cherokee.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3.0 diesel 'Limited', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door off roader
Año de fabricación 2011
Peso en vacío 2326kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - applies to all Grand Cherokees of the specification tested
Clase Large Off-Road 4x4
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración






Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

In the frontal impact, the driver's inboard seat rail was found to have very nearly broken in two, and was mainly held together only by the threaded steel rod which controls fore-aft adjustment of the seat. The break occurred just at the point where the lower anchorage for the driver's seat belt attaches to the rail, and is thought to have been caused by the high tensile forces in the belt during the test. As a result, there was additional forward movement of the dummy which contributed to 'bottoming out' of the airbag i.e. there was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent the driver's head from making contact, through the fabric of the airbag, with the steering wheel rim. Jeep has investigated the cause of the seat rail failure and cars from VIN 1C4RJFJG4EC139637 have a modified design to prevent such fracture. Earlier cars have not been modified. Although dummy readings were good, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test but, in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal. The Grand Cherokee has an 'active' head restraint which senses when a rear-end impact has occurred and moves the restraint forward to minimise the time to restrain head movement. Jeep showed that the system responded in a broad range of accident severities, and the whiplash tests were performed with the system active. Nevertheless, the protection provided against neck injuries in a rear-end collision was rated as marginal.