- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Izquierda con solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Sin solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Derecha con solape parcial
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | |||
---|---|---|---|
Segunda fila | |||
Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of neck tension in the 10-year dummy indicated weak protection. Protection of other critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier test, protection was good all-round. The front passenger airbag cannot be disabled so rearward-facing child restraints should not be used in this seating position. All restraint types for which the Cherokee is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 16,2 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 2,3 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Pedestrian Emergency Braking | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 2 km/h | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Función de frenado automático |
The bonnet provided good or adequate protection at nearly all points on the bonnet surface, with some poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection. The AEB system responds to some vulnerable road users, as well as to other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system showed marginal performance, with collisions avoided or mitigated only in some scenarios. The system does not respond to faster-moving road-users like cyclists.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Active Speed Limiter |
Función de control de velocidad | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | All Seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Detección de ocupantes | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | LaneSense |
Tipo | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
Operativo a partir de | 60 km/h |
Comportamiento | |
Permanencia de carril de emergencia | |
Permanencia de carril | |
Interfaz Hombre-maquina |
Nombre del sistema | Forward Collision Warning Plus | |||
Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 1.8 km/h | |||
Información adicional | Supplementary warning |
In tests of its response to other cars at highway speeds, the AEB system demonstrated adequate performance. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes more aggressively in some critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps to prevent over-speeding, and is fitted as standard across the range.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Jeep Cherokee 2.2 diesel ESS 'Limited', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door SUV
Año de fabricación 2019
Peso en vacío 1906kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all 2.2 diesel Jeep Cherokees
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Variante de la gama de modelos
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 2.2 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.2 diesel* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
1 Additional data required
Revisiones anuales y modelos rediseñados





The passenger compartment of the Cherokee remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and the rear seat passenger. In the side barrier impact, the Cherokee scored maximum points with good protection of all critical parts of the body. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection of the chest.
Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Cherokee has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which operates at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur. Tests of this functionality showed poor performance, the system failing to mitigate collisions at speeds below 20km/h in some scenarios. In any case, the car was not eligible for points for this technology owing to the marginal rating for its dynamic whiplash performance.