-
Más información
![]()
78% -
Más información
![]()
65% -
Más información
![]()
43% -
Más información
![]()
71%
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
Conductor
Asiento delantero
Vehículo
Mástil
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opciónIn the frontal impact, movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints. The front passenger airbag cannot be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. The labels warning of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that seating position were not sufficiently clear. The restraint of the 18 month dummy had instruction and warning labels which were not permanently attached and points were lost as a result.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Impacto en cabeza 9.6 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6 Ptos
The XF is equipped with an active bonnet. When sensors in the bumper detect that a pedestrian has been struck, an airbag system lifts the bonnet away from hard structures in the engine bay. This additional space offers better protection to a pedestrian's head. However, tests showed that the system was not as sensitive as Euro NCAP now requires so the protection offered to the head of a struck child was assessed with the system undeployed. In most areas tested, child head protection was poor although some areas were good. Similarly, for the head of an adult, different levels of protection were offered in different areas: most tests on the bonnet surface showed good protection but the results elsewhere were generally poor. The front edge of the bonnet did not score any points for the protection provided to pedestrians' legs but the bumper scored maximum points.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
| Nombre del sistema | DSC | |
| Comportamiento | ||
| Se aplica a | Front seats | ||
| Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
SuspendidoThe XF is fitted with electronic stability control as standard. A seatbelt reminder system covering both front seats is also standard. An active, driver-set speed limiter is standard equipment but did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements, and was not rewarded.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Revisiones y rediseños anuales
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Jaguar XF 3.0 diesel 'Premium Luxury', RHD
Tipo de carrocería - 4 door saloon
Año de fabricación 2010
Peso en vacío 1776kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - applies to all XFs of the specification tested
Clase Segmento E
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
Instalado en el vehículo como opción![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible![]()
No aplicable
Instalado en el vehículo como opciónVídeos
Revisiones y rediseños anuales
Compartir
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and protection for the knee/femur/pelvis body region was rated as marginal. Maximum points were scored in the side impact barrier test, all parts of the body being well protected. In the more severe side pole impact, rib deflections in the dummy indicated weak protection of the chest. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear end collision.