Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente





- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contacts with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Clear information is provided in the car about the dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 18,6 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 0,9 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The Santa Fe scored maximum points for the protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor or marginal. The car has an active 'pop-up' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and the bonnet is lifted to provide additional clearance to hard structures beneath. Hyundai showed that the system worked over a range of speeds and for different pedestrian statures so the bonnet was tested in the deployed position. In those areas likely to be struck by a child's head, protection was almost all good. In those areas where an adult's head would strike, protection was good on the bonnet surface but was marginal or poor along the bottom edge of the windscreen.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | ESP | |
Comportamiento | ||
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 34800% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 13800% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.1 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Se aplica a | Front seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Santa Fe has electronic stability control as standard and the system met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is also standard for driver and front passenger seats but there is no system for the rear seats. The car's standard-fit driver-set speed limitation device met Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2 diesel, 5 seat 'Comfort', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door SUV
Año de fabricación 2012
Peso en vacío 1910kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - applies to all Santa Fes of the specification tested
Clase SUV grande
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración










Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both front seat occupants. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the Santa Fe scored maximum points with good protection of all body regions. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate while that of other body regions was good. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.