- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Izquierda con solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Sin solape parcial
-
Aproximación a un vehículo parado: Derecha con solape parcial
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In both the frontal and side barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for both dummies with the exception of the head of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as adequate. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One universal child restraint could not be properly installed in the rear centre seat owing to the centre tunnel preventing correct placement of the support leg of the base. Otherwise, all restraints types for the which the Kuga is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 17,7 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 5,2 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 5,8 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 10 km/h | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Función de frenado automático |
-
Ciclista cruzando la carretera
-
Ciclista moviéndose en la misma dirección
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided generally good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The Kuga's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to both was good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Adjustable Speed Limiting Device |
Función de control de velocidad | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | All Seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Detección de ocupantes | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | Lane Keeping System |
Tipo | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
Operativo a partir de | 30 km/h |
Comportamiento | |
Permanencia de carril de emergencia | |
Permanencia de carril | |
Interfaz Hombre-maquina |
Nombre del sistema | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h |
The Kuga has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps the driver to avoid over-speeding.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Ford Kuga 2.0 diesel 4x4 automatic, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door SUV
Año de fabricación 2019
Peso en vacío 1769kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Kugas
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Variante de la gama de modelos
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
Revisiones anuales y modelos rediseñados



The passenger compartment of the Kuga remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest and lower leg was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection the driver's chest was again marginal but that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.