Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
The Panda Cross scored maximum points in the dynamic impact tests for its protection of the 1½ year and 3 year dummies, both of which were sat in rearward-facing restraints. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch to deactivate the airbag is not clearly labelled and the system was not rewarded by Euro NCAP. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 12,4 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 5,1 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 0,8 Ptos
The bumper offered predominantly poor protection to pedestrians' legs, while the protection offered to the pelvis region was mostly good. Tests on the bonnet surface showed predominantly adequate or marginal protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Comportamiento | ||
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 0% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 0% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
Se aplica a | All seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Panda Cross has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seating positions. Neither a speed limitation system nor a lane assist system are available and the Panda Cross does not have autonomous emergency braking.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado FIAT Panda Cross 1.3 MJ 4X4
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2015
Peso en vacío 1150kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all Panda Cross of the specification tested
Clase Small Off-Road 4x4
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración












Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Examination of the dummy readings and the high-speed films revealed that the head had made contact, through the deflating airbag, with the steering wheel. A penalty was applied and the driver's head protection was rated as adequate. At around the same time during the impact, with insufficient gas in the airbag, the chest contacted the rim of the steering wheel and, combined with dummy readings for chest compression, its protection was rated as weak. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Fiat showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver's chest was marginal, despite the standard-fit seatbelt pretensioners and load-limiters. Without these, protection of the rear seat occupant was rated as poor for the head and the chest, and weak for the neck. In the side impact barrier test, the Panda Cross scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, protection of all body areas was good except the chest, protection of which was adequate. Dynamic tests and geometric assessments indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries for the front and rear seat occupants.