- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of the 10 and 6 year dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the C4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 15,3 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 6,0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Active Safety Brake | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 10 km/h | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Función de frenado automático |
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but tests on areas around the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars indicated poor protection. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs and the pelvis area was also well protected, the C4 scoring maximum points in both of these areas. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the C4 detects some vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the AEB system showed marginal performance, with avoidance or mitigation only in some of the test scenarios.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Speed Limit Sign Recognition & Recommendation |
Función de información de limitación de velocidad | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Función de control de velocidad | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Detección de ocupantes | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | Driver Attention Warning |
Tipo | Steering input and standard deviation of lane positioning |
Operativo a partir de | 65 km/h |
Nombre del sistema | Lane Keeping Assist |
Tipo | LKA and ELK |
Operativo a partir de | 65 km/h |
Comportamiento | |
Permanencia de carril de emergencia | |
Permanencia de carril | |
Interfaz Hombre-maquina |
Nombre del sistema | Active Safety Brake | |||
Tipo | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 10 km/h | |||
Sensor utilizado | camera only |
The C4 is equipped as standard with a seatbelt reminder system for front and rear seats. A camera-based speed limit recognition system advises the driver of the local speed limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. Lane support is provided by ‘Lane Keep Assist’ which corrects the course of a vehicle which is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its recognition and response to other vehicles.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Citroën C4 1.2 petrol 'Feel Pack', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2021
Peso en vacío 1305kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all C4s
Clase Familiar pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Variante de la gama de modelos
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol* | C4 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 diesel | C4 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | pure electric | ë-C4 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación

The passenger compartment of the C4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings demonstrated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Citroën showed that the same level of protection would be provided to the upper legs of occupants of different statures to the test dummy and to those sitting in different positions. However, dummy readings also indicated marginal protection of the front passenger's lower leg. Analysis of decelerations of the impact trolley and of the deformed impact barrier after the test indicated that the C4 would be a reasonably benign collision partner. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical parts of the body. The C4 scored maximum points in both the side barrier and side pole impacts, with good protection of all critical body regions. The extent to which sideways excursion (movement of the occupant to the opposite side of the car) was mitigated was rated as [poor] [weak], and no counter-measure is fitted to prevent occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The C4 is equipped with 'In-Crash Braking', a system designed to prevent secondary impacts after a collision. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements and was not rewarded.