Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
-
Más información
![]()
90% -
Más información
![]()
87% -
Más información
![]()
74% -
Más información
![]()
77%
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
Conductor
Acompañantes traseros
Conductor
Vehículo
Mástil
Asiento trasero
Asiento delantero
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad| Posición del asiento | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
| Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
Both child dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints in the offset frontal test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of both the 1½ year and 3 year dummies in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the X1/X2 is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Impacto en cabeza 19,4 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 1,3 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
Both the X1 and the X2 have a 'pop-up' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators raise the bonnet to provide greater clearance between the surface and the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for a variety of pedestrian statures and across a range of speeds. Accordingly, tests were done with the bonnet in the deployed (raised) position. Results on the bonnet surface were almost entirely good, with some areas of adequate protection to a pedestrian's head. Some poor results were recorded only on the front edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Additional tests on the X2 gave results that were better than those of the X1. The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. Protection of the pelvic region was predominantly poor.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
| Nombre del sistema | ISA |
| Función de información de limitación de velocidad | Camera based |
| Función de advertencia | System advised |
| Función de limitación de velocidad | System advised |
| Nombre del sistema | DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) | |
| Comportamiento | ||
| Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 1500% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 1500% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.3 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Se aplica a | All seats | ||
| Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| Nombre del sistema | Approach Warning with City Brake Activation | |||
| Tipo | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h | |||
| Información adicional | Default On | |||
| Comportamiento | | ||||
| Solo función de frenado automático | el conductor reacciona a la advertencia | |||
| Velocidad operativa | 5-80 km/h | 5-250 km/h | ||
| aproximación a un vehículo parado | Ver Sistema AEB para ciudad | Colisión evitada hasta 70 km/h.Velocidad de colisión reducida hasta 80 km/h. | ||
| aproximación a un vehículo más lento | Colisión evitada hasta 40 km/h.Velocidad de colisión reducida hasta 70 km/h. | Colisión evitada hasta 80 km/h. | ||
| Seguir un vehículo a corta distancia | ||||
| el vehículo delantero frena con suavidad | Mitigación | Prevención | ||
| el vehículo delantero frena con brusquedad | Mitigación | Mitigación | ||
| Seguir un vehículo a larga distancia | ||||
| el vehículo delantero frena con suavidad | Mitigación | Prevención | ||
| el vehículo delantero frena con brusquedad | Mitigación | Prevención | ||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the X1 and X2, together with a seatbelt reminder system that protects the front and rear seats. Autonomous emergency braking is also standard and demonstrated adequate performance in Euro NCAP's tests. A standard-fit, camera-based speed limiter advises the driver of the limit and allows the driver to set the appropriate maximum speed for the vehicle.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado BMW X1 sDrive18d, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door SUV
Año de fabricación 2015
Peso en vacío 1320kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all X1s and X2s
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
Instalado en el vehículo como opción![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible![]()
No aplicable
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
The BMW X2 shares a platform and almost all of its structure with the X1. As the X2 has a slightly different side frame and a new bumper front, additional tests have been performed, notably in side, pole and leg impact. A review by Euro NCAP of the results of these tests and of further data provided by BMW reveals that the 2015 rating of the X1 can also be applied to the X2.
Compartir
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummy. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Data reviewed by Euro NCAP showed marginally better performance of the X2 than that of the X1 in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of all body regions was good for all critical body regions of the driver and rear passenger, with the exception of the chest, protection of which was adequate. Data for the X2 showed slightly poorer chest protection than that of the X1 but, overall performance was very similar. The X1 scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and in the more severe side pole test, with good protection of all critical parts of the body. When the same tests were repeated on the X2, good protection was again seen for all critical body areas. The front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end impact while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection for the occupants of those seats. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system showed good performance in Euro NCAP's tests of its performance at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused.