
The passenger compartment of the LEAF remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the front passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated that the dummy head had made contact with part of the vehicle interior, suggesting that there was insufficient pressure in the airbag. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for both front dummies. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good but readings indicated that the force in the lap section of the seatbelt had dropped during the impact. Readings from the chest of the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good apart from the neck of the 10-year dummy, protection of which was rated as weak owing to measured values of tensile forces. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the LEAF is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate, with some poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs and pelvic region was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Overall, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its protection of vulnerable road users, with performance ranging from good to marginal in the individual test scenarios.
The LEAF has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats but missed out on full points as it lacks occupant detection in the rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system uses a camera and a digital map to inform the driver of the appropriate limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. The lane support system also uses the camera to help the driver not to drift out of lane. This system needs to be activated by the driver and does not switch on by default at the start of a journey. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well overall in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with good performance in most of the test scenarios.
The passenger compartment of the LEAF remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the front passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated that the dummy head had made contact with part of the vehicle interior, suggesting that there was insufficient pressure in the airbag. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for both front dummies. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good but readings indicated that the force in the lap section of the seatbelt had dropped during the impact. Readings from the chest of the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good apart from the neck of the 10-year dummy, protection of which was rated as weak owing to measured values of tensile forces. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the LEAF is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate, with some poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs and pelvic region was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Overall, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its protection of vulnerable road users, with performance ranging from good to marginal in the individual test scenarios.
The LEAF has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats but missed out on full points as it lacks occupant detection in the rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system uses a camera and a digital map to inform the driver of the appropriate limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. The lane support system also uses the camera to help the driver not to drift out of lane. This system needs to be activated by the driver and does not switch on by default at the start of a journey. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well overall in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with good performance in most of the test scenarios.


The passenger compartment of the LEAF remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the front passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated that the dummy head had made contact with part of the vehicle interior, suggesting that there was insufficient pressure in the airbag. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for both front dummies. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good but readings indicated that the force in the lap section of the seatbelt had dropped during the impact. Readings from the chest of the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good apart from the neck of the 10-year dummy, protection of which was rated as weak owing to measured values of tensile forces. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the LEAF is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate, with some poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs and pelvic region was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Overall, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its protection of vulnerable road users, with performance ranging from good to marginal in the individual test scenarios.
The LEAF has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats but missed out on full points as it lacks occupant detection in the rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system uses a camera and a digital map to inform the driver of the appropriate limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. The lane support system also uses the camera to help the driver not to drift out of lane. This system needs to be activated by the driver and does not switch on by default at the start of a journey. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well overall in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with good performance in most of the test scenarios.
| Offset Deformable Barrier | Full Width Rigid Barrier |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Side Mobile Barrier | Side Pole |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Rear Seat | Front Seat |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
Frontal Impact - 14.3 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer KidFix XP Restraint for 10 year old child: Booster Cushion | ![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer KidFix XP Restraint for 10 year old child: Booster Cushion |
Equipment | Front Passenger | Row 2 Outboard | Row 2 Center | 3rd row outboard |
Isofix | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated CRS |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
![]() |
|
System Name | Intelligent Emergency Braking With Pedestrian And Cyclist Recognition | |
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |
Operational From | 10 km/h | |
Scenario | Day time | Night time |
Adult crossing the road | ||
Child running from behind parked vehicles | ||
Adult along the roadside |
Scenario | Day time |
Approaching a crossing cyclist | |
Approaching a cyclist along the roadside |
System Name | Speed Limiter with Traffic Sign recognition |
Speed Limit Info Function | Camera & Map |
Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection |
System Name | Lane departure prevention (LDP) |
System Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 55km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface | |
System Name | Intelligent Emergency Braking system |
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning |
Operational From | 5 km/h |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Approaching a stationary car | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | ||
Approaching a braking car |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | |||
Side Chest Airbag | |||
Side Pelvis Airbag | |||
Centre Airbag |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | ||
i-Size | ||
Integrated Child Seat | ||
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | ||
Child Presence Detection |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year





Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|
Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|
Date | Event | Outcome |
|---|