-
Mehr lesen
![]()
71% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
75% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
54% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
33%
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Beifahrer
Fahrer
Rücksitz
Vordersitz
Fahrzeug
Pfeiler
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
![]()
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig![]()
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich![]()
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich-
Säuglinge bis 13 kg
-
Säuglinge und Kleinkinder bis 18 kg
-
Kleinkinder von 9 bis 18 kg
-
Kleinkinder über 18 kg
![]()
Problemloser Einbau![]()
Einbau mit Vorsicht![]()
Sicherheitskritisches Problem![]()
Einbau nicht zulässig
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem| Sitzposition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
| Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Problemloser Einbau![]()
Einbau mit Vorsicht![]()
Sicherheitskritisches Problem![]()
Einbau nicht zulässig
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Kopfaufprall 13,6 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 0,0 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6,0 Punkte
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
| Systembezeichnung | ESP | |
| Leistung | ||
| Gilt für | Not available | ||
| Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
| Visuell | |
 |
|
| Akustisch | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is fitted as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver's seat but is not available for the passenger seat so the system was not rewarded. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option. As it is fitted to most cars sold, it was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. Neither lane assist nor autonomous emergency braking are available.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Gültigkeit der Bewertung
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Karosserietyp - 4 door sedan
Baujahr 2014
Leergewicht 1044kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - applies to all Peugeot 301s of the specification listed
Klasse Kompaktwagen
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
![]()
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig![]()
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug als Option![]()
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich![]()
Nicht verfügbar![]()
Nicht anwendbar
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug als OptionVideos
Gültigkeit der Bewertung
Jährliche Überprüfungen und Facelifts
The Peugeot 301 is identical to the Citroën C-Elysée. Data provided by Peugeot-Citroën shows that the results of the tests done on the Citroën would apply also to the Peugeot 301. The comments below are based on tests done on the C-Elysée
Weiterleiten
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good, except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.