- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte der Registerkarte „Bewertungsgültigkeit“ der Bewertung
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
Sitzposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
In both the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, based on in-test measurements of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the MG 4 Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht

Kopfaufprall 15,6 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 5,5 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6,0 Punkte
Systembezeichnung | Front Collision Assist System | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 4 km/h | |||
Leistung | | ||||
Bremsautomatik |
-
Radfahrer von der zugewandten Seite, mit Sichtbehinderungen
-
Kreuzender Radfahrer
-
Radfahrer entlang Straßenrand
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, being mostly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but with marginal or poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MG can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and well in tests of its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Systembezeichnung | Speed Assist System |
Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | Camera based |
Tempomatik | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gilt für | Front and rear seats | ||
Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
Visuell | |||
Akustisch | |||
Insassenerkennung | |||
|
Systembezeichnung | UDW & DMS |
Typ | steering input and direct eye monitoring |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Systembezeichnung | Lane Departure Assist System |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Leistung | |
Notfall-Spurhalteassistent | |
Spurhalteassistent | |
Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle |
Systembezeichnung | Front Collision Assist System | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 4 km/h | |||
Verwendeter Sensor | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MG 4 Electric performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter is fitted as standard equipment and met Euro NCAP’s requirements for accuracy.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Bewertungsgültigkeit
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle MG4 Electric
Karosserietyp - 5 door Hatchback
Baujahr 2022
Leergewicht 1685kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all MG 4 Electrics
Klasse Kompaktwagen
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht anwendbar
Videos
Bewertungsgültigkeit
Baureihenvarianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | electric | MG 4 EV | 4 x 2* | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung

The passenger compartment of the MG 4 Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but some structures in the dashboard were thought to present a hazard for occupants of different sizes or to those sitting in different positions. Dummy readings of the driver’s chest compression indicated marginal protection of that body region. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection of all critical body areas. However, analysis post-test analysis of the film showed that the head of the rear passenger dummy had moved forward more than is recommended, and protection of that body area was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, all critical parts of the body were well protected and the MG 4 Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was poor. The MG 4 Electric does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However the rear seats scored no points for whiplash protection as the centre position in that row lacks adequate head restraint. The MG 4 Electric has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash and a system which applies the brakes to prevent secondary collisions.