- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte der Registerkarte „Bewertungsgültigkeit“ der Bewertung
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


Beifahrer
außen
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
Sitzposition | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | ||
Beifahrer | Links | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10 year child was rated as poor, based on dummy readings of decelerations. The front passenger airbag can be switched off to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. There was insufficient space to install one of the ISOFIX child restraints in the seat behind the driver’s seat. Otherwise, the 500e could accommodate the restraints for which it is designed.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht

Kopfaufprall 12,8 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 2,1 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6,0 Punkte
Systembezeichnung | Autonomous Emergency Brake Control | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Leistung | | ||||
Bremsautomatik |
-
Radfahrer von der zugewandten Seite, mit Sichtbehinderungen
-
Kreuzender Radfahrer
-
Radfahrer entlang Straßenrand
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, some test points demonstrating good protection and others poor. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrian's legs at all test positions. However, protection of the pelvis was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection. The 500e's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system detects vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system's response to such road-users, performance was rated as good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test cases.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Systembezeichnung | Intelligent Speed Limiter |
Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Tempomatik | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gilt für | Front and rear seats | ||
Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
Visuell | |||
Akustisch | |||
Insassenerkennung | |||
|
Systembezeichnung | Attention Assist / Drowsy Driver Alert |
Typ | Vehicle path in lane |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Systembezeichnung | Lane Control |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h |
Leistung | |
Notfall-Spurhalteassistent | |
Spurhalteassistent | |
Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle |
Systembezeichnung | Autonomous Emergency Brake Control | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Verwendeter Sensor | camera only |
The 500e’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed marginally in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for all seats and the 500e is also equipped with ‘Drowsy Driver Alert’, which monitors the car’s path within a lane for patterns which are characteristic of a fatigued or inattentive driver. Lane assistance is provided by 'Lane Control’, a system which corrects the car's path if it is drifting out of lane and which also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system detects the local speed limit, and allows the limiter to be set appropriately.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Bewertungsgültigkeit
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle FIAT 500e 'ICON', LHD
Karosserietyp - 3 door hatchback
Baujahr 2021
Leergewicht 1328kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all 500e
Klasse Kleinstwagen
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht anwendbar
Videos
Bewertungsgültigkeit
Baureihenvarianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
3 door hatchback | 87 kW electric motor | Hatchback* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 87 kW electric motor | 3+1 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
2 door roadster | 87 kW electric motor | Cabrio | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung

The passenger compartment of the 500e remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. On the driver’s side, some structures in the dashboard were considered to be potentially more aggressive if the occupants knees were to strike at a slightly different location and protection was rated as adequate. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the 500e would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of both the driver and rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on readings of chest compression. All other critical body areas were rated as good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the 500e scored maximum points. Limitation of occupant excursion - the extent to which the occupant is flung to the other side of the vehicle in a side impact - was rated as poor. The 500e is not equipped with a counter-measure to protect against occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injures in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The 500e does not have an advanced eCall system to alert the emergency services in the event of a collision, nor a system to prevent secondary impacts.