- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte der Registerkarte „Bewertungsgültigkeit“ der Bewertung
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
Sitzposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
In both the frontal offset and the side impact barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for all critical body areas, for both the 6 and 10 year dummy, and maximum points were scored for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a reward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht

Kopfaufprall 20,8 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 0,8 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6,0 Punkte
Systembezeichnung | Pedestrian Warning with City Braking Function | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Leistung | | ||||
Bremsautomatik |
-
Radfahrer von der zugewandten Seite, mit Sichtbehinderungen
-
Kreuzender Radfahrer
-
Radfahrer entlang Straßenrand
The i4 has an ‘active’ bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been hit and actuators lift the bonnet surface to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system operated robustly for different pedestrian statures and over a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the bonnet was tested in the raised, ‘deployed’ position and the protection provided was almost completely good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was largely poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the i4 can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and to cyclists.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Systembezeichnung | Speed Limit Assist |
Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Tempomatik | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gilt für | Front and rear seats | ||
Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
Visuell | |||
Akustisch | |||
Insassenerkennung | |||
|
Systembezeichnung | Attentiveness Assistant |
Typ | Steering input |
Verfügbar ab | 70 km/h |
Systembezeichnung | Lane Departure Warning |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Verfügbar ab | 70 km/h |
Leistung | |
Notfall-Spurhalteassistent | |
Spurhalteassistent | |
Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle |
Systembezeichnung | Collision Warning with Braking Function | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Verwendeter Sensor | camera and radar |
The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles, with impacts avoided or mitigated in many test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard and the car is equipped with a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning when a pattern characteristic of drowsy or impaired driving is detected. A combined camera/navigation system identified the local speed limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set accordingly. If the car is drifting out of lane, a lane keep assist system gently corrects the vehicle’s path. The system also intervenes in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure for example.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Bewertungsgültigkeit
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle BMW i4, LHD
Karosserietyp - 4 door saloon
Baujahr 2022
Leergewicht 2050kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all i4s
Klasse Mittelklasse
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht anwendbar
Videos
Bewertungsgültigkeit
Baureihenvarianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 eDrive40* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 M50 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung

The passenger compartment of the i4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers demonstrated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. BMW demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the i4 would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid-barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, for both the driver and rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and maximum points were scored. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The i4 does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The i4 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but no system to apply the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.