The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is a partner model to the Renault 5 E-Tech Electric tested by Euro NCAP in 2024. Additional tests have been performed but many are read across from the Renault 5 assessment.
The passenger compartment of the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Renault demonstrated that a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions. The driver’s chest protection was rated as marginal, based on readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Otherwise, all critical parts of the body were well or adequately protected for both occupants. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric does not have a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision. Renault demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for the 6 and 10 year dummy, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is not equipped with a 'child presence detection' system, to warn when a child may have been left in the car. All child restraint types for which the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was predominantly good or adequate, with a few poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, while that of the femur was good at all test locations. Protection of the knee and tibia was predominantly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Renault can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system’s response both to pedestrians was adequate. A system to protect pedestrians to the rear of the car is an option and was not included in this assessment. The system’s performance in tests of its reaction to cyclists was good but protection against ‘dooring’ (where a door is suddenly opened in the path of a cyclist approaching from behind) is an option and not assessed. Performance of the AEB system was good in tests of its response to motorcyclists.
Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided in most tests. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats. The car has an indirect driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue but not distraction. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit. The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.
The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is a partner model to the Renault 5 E-Tech Electric tested by Euro NCAP in 2024. Additional tests have been performed but many are read across from the Renault 5 assessment.
The passenger compartment of the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Renault demonstrated that a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions. The driver’s chest protection was rated as marginal, based on readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Otherwise, all critical parts of the body were well or adequately protected for both occupants. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric does not have a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision. Renault demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for the 6 and 10 year dummy, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is not equipped with a 'child presence detection' system, to warn when a child may have been left in the car. All child restraint types for which the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was predominantly good or adequate, with a few poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, while that of the femur was good at all test locations. Protection of the knee and tibia was predominantly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Renault can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system’s response both to pedestrians was adequate. A system to protect pedestrians to the rear of the car is an option and was not included in this assessment. The system’s performance in tests of its reaction to cyclists was good but protection against ‘dooring’ (where a door is suddenly opened in the path of a cyclist approaching from behind) is an option and not assessed. Performance of the AEB system was good in tests of its response to motorcyclists.
Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided in most tests. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats. The car has an indirect driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue but not distraction. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit. The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.
The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is a partner model to the Renault 5 E-Tech Electric tested by Euro NCAP in 2024. Additional tests have been performed but many are read across from the Renault 5 assessment.
The passenger compartment of the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Renault demonstrated that a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions. The driver’s chest protection was rated as marginal, based on readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Otherwise, all critical parts of the body were well or adequately protected for both occupants. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric does not have a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision. Renault demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for the 6 and 10 year dummy, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is not equipped with a 'child presence detection' system, to warn when a child may have been left in the car. All child restraint types for which the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was predominantly good or adequate, with a few poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, while that of the femur was good at all test locations. Protection of the knee and tibia was predominantly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Renault can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system’s response both to pedestrians was adequate. A system to protect pedestrians to the rear of the car is an option and was not included in this assessment. The system’s performance in tests of its reaction to cyclists was good but protection against ‘dooring’ (where a door is suddenly opened in the path of a cyclist approaching from behind) is an option and not assessed. Performance of the AEB system was good in tests of its response to motorcyclists.
Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided in most tests. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats. The car has an indirect driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue but not distraction. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit. The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.
| Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier | Full Width Rigid Barrier | |
|---|---|---|
| Side Mobile Barrier | Side Pole |
|---|---|
| Far-Side Excursion | Occupant Interaction |
| Rear Seat | Front Seat |
|---|---|
Frontal Impact - 14.9 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix i-Size Restraint for 10 year old child: Peg pereggo viaggio 2-3 shuttle | Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix i-Size Restraint for 10 year old child: Peg pereggo viaggio 2-3 shuttle |
Equipment | Front passenger | Row 2 outboard | Row 2 center | Row 3 outboard |
Isofix |  |  |  |  |
i-Size | | | | |
Top tether | | | | |
Integrated CRS | | | | |
Child Presence Detection | | | | |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
     |
|
System Name | Active Emergency Braking System | |
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |
Operational From | 8 km/h | |
Scenario | Day time | Night time |
Car reversing into adult or child |  |  |
Adult crossing a road into which a car is turning | | |
Adult crossing the road | | |
Child running from behind parked vehicles | | |
Adult along the roadside | | |
Scenario | Day time |
Approaching cyclist crossing from behind parked vehicles | |
Turning across path of an oncoming cyclist | |
Approaching a crossing cyclist | |
Approaching a cyclist along the roadside | |
Scenario | Day time |
Dooring a passing cyclist | option, not tested |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Approaching a stationary motorcyclist | | |
Approaching a braking motorcyclist | | |
Turn across the path of an oncoming motorcyclist | | |
Scenario | Day time |
Changing lane across the path of an oncoming motorcyclist | |
Changing lane across the path of an overtaking motorcyclist | |
System Name | Traffic Sign Recognition |
Speed Limit Info Function | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Speed Control Function | Intelligent Speed Limiter not default ON (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | | | |
Audible | | | |
Occupant Detection | | | |
System Name | Driver Vigilance Warning |
Type | Indirect monitoring |
Operational From | 65km/h |
Fatigue | Drowsiness |
Distraction |  |
System Name | Lane Keep Assist |
System Type | LKA and ELK |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 65km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface | |
System Name | Active Emergency Braking System |
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning |
Operational From | 7 km/h |
Sensor Used | Camera and radar |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Approaching a car crossing a junction | | |
Approaching a car head-on | | |
Turning across the path of an oncoming car | | |
Approaching a stationary car | | |
Approaching a slower moving car | | |
Approaching a braking car | | |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | | | |
Belt Pretensioner | | | |
Belt Loadlimiter | | | |
Knee Airbag | | | |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | | | |
Side Chest Airbag | | | |
Side Pelvis Airbag | | | |
Centre Airbag | | | |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | | |
i-Size | | |
Integrated Child Seat | | |
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | | |
Child Presence Detection | | |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder | | | |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection | |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year
Date | Event | Rating | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
2025-05-21 | Rating Published | |
Body type | Variant description | Drivetrain | Rating applies LHD | Rating applies RHD |
|---|
