Brand logo

Honda ZR-V

ZR-V frontal view
youtube
Play
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
test picture
2023
Standard
Standard

VERDICT

The passenger compartment of the ZR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for the front passenger and driver.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the ZR-V would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good apart from the chest of the rear passenger, which was rated as marginal based on dummy readings of compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the ZR-V scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was adequate. The ZR-V has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts.  However, in Euro NCAP's test, the heads of the driver and front seat passenger hit each other and protection was rated as poor. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The ZR-V has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash.   However, the car lacks a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.  Honda demonstrated that if the car entered water the doors, if locked, could be opened within two minutes of power being lost but provided no evidence that electric windows would remain functional long enough to allow occupants to escape.

Tested modelHonda ZR-V 2.0 hybrid 'ADVANCE', LHD
Body typeHatchback
Kerb weight1635 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

79%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

86%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

81%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

68%

Safety equipment

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating validity

Additional information

Euro NCAP | Honda ZR-V