Pictures (4)
|
Films (3)
Front: 15
Side: 15
Seatbelt reminder: 2
Pole: 2
Print this page
TESTS
Latest results
Test results
Supermini
Small Family Car
Large Family Car
Executive
Small MPV
Large MPV
Roadster sports
Small Off-Road 4x4
Large Off-Road 4x4
Test procedures
ESC Fitment
Choose below to begin your search
Class:
Make:
Search:
View all results
Adult occupant protection
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact passenger
Side impact driver
Child restraints
18 month old Child
Volvo child seat, facing
3 year old Child
Volvo child seat, facing
Pedestrian protection
Pedestrian protection
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
ISOfix front
ISOfix rear
Car details
Body type
3 door hatchback
Year of publication
2007
Kerb weight
1352kg
VIN from which rating applies
applies to all C30's
Comments
Front impact
The steering-wheel moved forward during the impact to provide greater protection for the driver. The driver dummy scored maximum points in the test but the car lost points because of some stiff structures in the dashboard which might affect the knees or femurs of larger or smaller occupants.
Side impact
The scored maximum points based on the dummy results in the side impact and pole tests. However, in the side impact, the head curtain airbag was prevented from deploying fully by the child restraint system in the rear seat.
Child-protection
The C30 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year old in the dynamic tests. The passenger airbag can be disconnected by Volvo dealers, allowing a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Volvo also offer an airbag deactivation switch as an option. However, the switch system does not provide clear information to the driver regarding the status of the passenger airbag. The presence of ISOFIX and top-tether anchorages was not clearly marked.
Pedestrian protection
The leading edge of the bonnet scored no points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs and the bonnet was predominantly rated as poor for the protection of adults' heads. However, the protection offered by the bumper was predominantly rated 'fair'.