Suzuki Grand Vitara
RATING
SCORE
ADULT OCCUPANT
***
23
Front: 8
Side: 15
PEDESTRIAN
N/A


 
Adult occupant protection
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact passenger
Frontal impact passenger
Side impact driver
Side impact driver

Child restraints
18 month old ChildBritax Roemer Duo, forward facing
3 year old ChildBritax Roemer Duo, forward facing
Pedestrian protection
No image car front available

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Hand of driveLHD
Tested modelSuzuki Grand Vitara 2.7ltr XL-7
Body typeoff-roader
Year of publication2002
Kerb weight1640kg
VIN from which rating appliesJSAHTX92V00170012

Comments
For such a large vehicle, the Latest Grand Vitara performed only reasonably in the occupant protection tests. But its worst performance was for pedestrian safety, where it scored no points and no stars. Suzuki has told Euro NCAP that it will pay greater attention with future designs to this important aspect of vehicle safety. The car put in a ‘disappointing’ performance in the frontal impact, too, putting its driver and front passenger at risk of chest and leg injuries. The side impact test outcome was reasonable, and both children were safeguarded throughout, although the younger child ran a slight risk of neck injury in the frontal impact.

Front impact
The restraints and airbags protected the front occupants’ heads and necks but forces fed through to the driver’s chest were high. The driver’s door buckled and the frame distorted and began to tear. There was also significant distortion of the footwell firewall; so the body was judged unstable. There were also hard points behind the fascia that put the driver and front passenger at severe risk. The centre rear belt was a lap-only type which, offers too little protection to occupants during a frontal impact.

Side impact
The Grand Vitara provided only reasonable protection for such a high vehicle, and chest loads were high from contact with the seat side wing and the door pillar trim.

Child-protection
The restraints were forward facing and used the two ISOFIX mounts, but they came without top tethers. Euro NCAP could not obtain replacements, so it tested the seats as they were. The 18-month-old child suffered a high neck load that is common for children so young if placed facing forward; rear-facing is favoured. Otherwise the restraints performed well. Permanent labels on the stowed side of both sun visors warned against using a rear-facing restraint opposite an airbag. However, three different pictograms were used in various locations to indicate the hazard, which could be confusing.

Pedestrian protection
Protection was dire and scored no points. Suzuki said it will do more in future to protect pedestrians.

EURO NCAP | 2 PLACE DU LUXEMBOURG, 1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | +32 2 400 77 40 | +32 2 400 77 41
  CONTACT US