SEARCH:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

Rating
Score
ADULT OCCUPANT
***
24
Front: 8
Side: 16
PEDESTRIAN
*
1


 
Adult occupant protection
Head: Adequate, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Marginal, Upper leg left: Marginal, Lower leg right: Marginal, Lower leg left: Marginal, Right foot: Weak, Left foot: Weak
Frontal impact driver
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Marginal, Upper leg right: Good, Upper leg left: Good, Lower leg right: Good, Lower leg left: Adequate
Frontal impact passenger
Head: Good, Chest: Good, Abdomen: Good, Pelvis: Good
Side impact driver

Child restraints
18 month old ChildNo information available
3 year old ChildNo information available
Pedestrian protection
No image car front available

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Hand of driveLHD
Tested modelMitsubishi Pajero Pinin 2.0
Body typeoff-roader
Year of publication2003
Kerb weight1300
VIN from which rating appliesJMPONH66W3X003028

Comments
The Pinin Pajero’s cabin became unstable in the frontal impact. The screen pillar on the driver’s side was pushed backwards and the B-pillar twisted. Impact forces fed through to the passenger’s chest were high, increasing his chances of injury, while the driver risked leg and feet injuries. Protection in the side impact was good, though. The younger child risked chest and neck injuries in the frontal impact but the child restraints otherwise worked reasonably. But safeguards for pedestrians were dreadful.

Front impact
The restraints and airbags worked well to protect the driver but the steering wheel was pushed upwards, adding to the risk of injury. Forces acting on the passenger’s chest were very high. Mitsubishi told Euro NCAP that the vehicle’s front belts were load limited but there was no sign of them functioning during the test. Hard points behind the fascia increased leg and feet injury risks for the driver as did the ruptured footwell and the distance that the brake pedal was pushed back. The plastic moulding over the outer seat back fractured where the seat belt loaded it and could damage the belt. Mitsubishi says this will be corrected on ’04 model year vehicles. This is a four-seater so no centre rear belt is provided.

Side impact
The high-set seats and the vehicle’s height helped keep occupants away from harm. The seat-mounted thorax airbags also reduced risks.

Child occupant
Mitsubishi recommended forward-facing restraints for both children. In the frontal impact, both were protected, but the younger child suffered high chest and neck loads. In the side impact, the older child risked head injuries. A warning against placing a child in a rear-facing restraint opposite an airbag was given in three languages but none was native to the country where Euro NCAP bought the vehicle. Mitsubishi said that this would be put right.

Pedestrian
The Pajero came close to scoring no points and no stars. Of all the areas tested only one site on the bonnet gave any cushioning at all for a pedestrian in a collision. Euro NCAP criticised this poor showing and has urged Mitsubishi to do more to protect pedestrians.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACT