Kia Carnival/Sedona
RATING
SCORE
ADULT OCCUPANT
**
18
Front: 4
Side: 14
PEDESTRIAN
*
4


 
Adult occupant protection
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact passenger
Frontal impact passenger

Child restraints
18 month old ChildBritax Roemer Baby-safe, rearward facing
3 year old ChildBritax Roemer Duo, forward facing
Pedestrian protection
No image car front available

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Hand of driveLHD
Tested modelKIA Carnival/Sedona 2.9 D
Body typeMPV
Year of publication2003
Kerb weight2220
VIN from which rating appliesKNEUP751336471405

Comments
KIA’s large MPV did badly in these tests. Its driver risked damage to his head, chest and legs while the front passenger risked chest injuries, too. The Carnival’s body was badly damaged in the frontal impact and became unstable. It did worse in the frontal test than in the others because the driver’s head and chest hit the steering wheel, the footwell ruptured and the pedals were pushed backwards by the impact. The child restraints did a good job, meeting Euro NCAP performance requirements. But protection for pedestrians was poor.

Front impact
The passenger safety cell was overwhelmed by the impact. Structural damage to the fascia and lower body was so great that little if any protection was given to the driver’s chest, legs and feet. And the distance that the steering wheel was displaced meant that the driver’s airbag could not do its work properly. Hard points behind the fascia added to the injury risks for those in the front. Only a two-point centre rear belt was fitted, and this provides less protection than that given by a three-point belt.

Side impact
For a car without side airbags, the Kia did reasonably, although the driver’s head hit the door pillar and his arm struck the side window, though not hard enough to break the glass. His body was also hit by the seat and door as the impact pushed it inwards.

Child-protection
The restraints (forward-facing for the older child, rear-facing for the younger) worked well, meeting all Euro NCAP performance requirements. A permanent warning against putting a rear-facing restraint on a seat opposite an airbag was given on the back of the passenger’s sun visor. However, it was written in English and as such was inappropriate for the vehicle tested, which was intended for sale in Holland.

Pedestrian protection
The parts of the vehicle’s front where a child’s head might hit offered some cushioning but other areas were unforgiving. Euro NCAP believes that KIA should take pedestrian protection more seriously if it is to offer realistic protection to this vulnerable group of road users.

EURO NCAP | 2 PLACE DU LUXEMBOURG, 1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | +32 2 400 77 40 | +32 2 400 77 41
  CONTACT US