SEARCH:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Jaguar X Type

Rating
Score
ADULT OCCUPANT
****
26
Front: 10
Side: 14
Pole: 2
PEDESTRIAN
*
2


 
Adult occupant protection
Head: Adequate, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Marginal, Upper leg left: Marginal, Lower leg right: Adequate, Lower leg left: Adequate, Right foot: Marginal, Left foot: Marginal
Frontal impact driver
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Good, Upper leg left: Marginal, Lower leg right: Adequate, Lower leg left: Adequate
Frontal impact passenger
Head: Good, Chest: Marginal, Abdomen: Adequate, Pelvis: Good
Side impact driver

Child restraints
18 month old ChildKiddy 2000, rearward facing
3 year old ChildBritax Roemer Duo, forward facing
Pedestrian protection
No image car front available

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Hand of driveLHD
Tested modelJaguar X-Type 2.0
Body type4 door saloon
Year of publication2002
Kerb weight1525
VIN from which rating appliesApplies to all applies X-types

Comments
The X-type is designed to meet world car demands and earned its four star rating without being outstanding. It has a strong body and all of its doors could be opened normally after the frontal test. However, the driver's airbag allowed his head the strike the steering wheel late in the impact. Jaguar says that the X-Type is the first car Euro NCAP has tested that can 'feel' when a child restraint is fitted to its front passenger seat and turns off its own airbag. Protection for the children seated in the rear was particularly good. However, as was the case for many of the cars tested here, the protection it gave to pedestrians was dire.

Front impact
The driver and passenger were well protected, except that the driver's airbag 'bottomed out' late in the test. However, his chest was kept clear of the wheel by it collapsing towards the fascia. The footwell was not distorted by the impact but the distance that the clutch pedal moved created a hazards. There was a foam footrest moulded into the driver's carpet that helps to protect his legs, but his and the passenger's knees risked injury from hard points beneath the fascia. The centre rear seat was equipped with a three-point belt. This provides greater protection than a lap-only belt.

Side impact
Despite the side airbag, the driver ran the risk of chest injuries. The head-protecting airbag curtain worked well for the driver and would also protect rear passengers.

Child occupant
A system with the ability to recognise the fitting of a child restraint of whatever make on the front passenger seat and turn off the airbag is unusual in executive-class cars like the X-type. Although Jaguar does not recommend the fitting of child seats in this position it does eliminate the risk of injuries caused by the airbag firing. The ISOFIX seat for the 3-year-old worked well in front and side impact. But NCAP noted that the seat's instructions for use came only in a booklet that could be lost. Better labelling on the seat and in the car would improve matters.

Pedestrian
Only one site out of 18 tested gave any protection to a pedestrian. This is a dire performance and Jaguar needs to improve the car's performance in this vital area.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACT