BMW 5 Series
RATING
SCORE
ADULT OCCUPANT
****
25
Front: 12
Side: 14
PEDESTRIAN
*
8
Pre 2002 rating


 
Adult occupant protection
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact driver
Frontal impact passenger
Frontal impact passenger
Side impact driver
Side impact driver

Child restraints
18 month old ChildBMW Junior, forward facing
3 year old ChildBMW Junior, forward facing
Pedestrian protection
No image car front available

Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag
Car details
Hand of driveLHD
Tested modelBMW 520i
Body type4-door saloon
Year of publication1998
Kerb weight1485
VIN from which rating appliesWBADD11000BN64341

Comments
BMW modified the 5-series after initial testing, chiefly because its front airbags fired late. Changes included a new airbag crash sensor, load-limiting front belts, and additional weld points in the footwell. Results given here are for upgraded cars which BMW says are on sale now. In the frontal impact, the driver's upper body was well protected, and the car meets side-impact legislation effective from October. The head protection airbag also worked well. Pedestrian protection was poor, however – the bonnet and bumper were judged to be particularly 'aggressive'.

Front impact
After the impact, the door aperture was little deformed and the body structure was stable. The left front wheel crushed the driver's footwell, causing a body seam to burst and expose the wheel arch liner. The driver and passenger airbags worked well and the load limiting belts reduced chest injury risks from those seen in the first test. The knee impact areas included hard contact points which could injure the driver's knees, upper legs and pelvis.

Side impact
Side-impact chest and head airbags are standard on this car. The head bags are designed to protect the occupants from hitting objects outside the car. As yet, Euro NCAP cannot test for this, so it does not add to the score. The car's rear door opened during the impact, meaning that unrestrained occupants risked being thrown out onto the road. The chest airbag cushioned the driver's arm, ribs and abdomen, but did not protect as well as those fitted to other cars tested.

Child-protection
A European car manufacturer's association (ACEA) pictogram on the door pillar and warnings in English and German stuck to the windscreen alerted drivers of the dangers of fitting a child seat in the front passenger seat. They did not warn of the risk of injury or death if disobeyed, however. This aside, Euro NCAP prefers warnings to be permanent – these could be peeled off or lost if the windscreen needed replacing. Both child dummies sat in BMW Junior forward-facing seats, which have adjustable floor braces. These are designed to prevent excessive forward movement and they worked well. The seats did not comply with regulation R44.03, however, because their belt routing was not colour-coded. Finally, neither seat contained the children's heads correctly in the side impact.

Pedestrian protection
BMW needs to be pay more attention to pedestrian protection. The front of the car is particularly hard and unforgiving, and 12 out of 18 test sites rated as 'poor'.

EURO NCAP | 2 PLACE DU LUXEMBOURG, 1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | +32 2 400 77 40 | +32 2 400 77 41
  CONTACT US