Choose below to begin your search
Class:
Make:
Search:
|
|
|
Adult occupant protection 
Frontal impact driver | 
Frontal impact passenger | 
Side impact driver |  |
|
|
|
Child restraints No child occupant protection data available |
|
Pedestrian protection 
Pedestrian protection |  |
|
|
|
Safety equipment | Front seatbelt pretensioners |  |
|---|
| Front seatbelt load limiters | |
|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | |
|---|
| Front passenger frontal airbag | |
|---|
| Side body airbags | |
|---|
| Side head airbags |  |
|---|
| Driver knee airbag | |
|---|
|
|
Car details | Tested model | Renault Twingo, 1.2 'Dynamique', LHD |
|---|
| Body type | 3 door hatchback |
|---|
| Year of publication | 2007 |
|---|
| Kerb weight | 960kg |
|---|
| VIN from which rating applies | applies to all Twingos |
|---|
|
|
|
Comments Front impact
The passenger compartment remained stable during the impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a potential hazard to the knees and femurs of both of the driver's legs and to the passenger's inboard leg.
Child-protection
With the front seats set to the Euro NCAP test position (mid-position of fore-aft adjustment), the child restraints recommended by Renault could not be fitted in the rear seats. Therefore, it was not possible to establish the child protection rating of the Twingo.
Pedestrian protection
The bumper offered predominantly fair protection to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was rated as poor and scored no points. The bonnet surface was rated as predominantly poor for the protection offered to pedestrians' heads.
|
|