SEARCH:
GO

Toyota Verso

Toyota Verso, 2.0 D-4D mid grade, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST


 

TEST RESULTS

Total 32 pts | 89%
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Good, Upper leg left: Good, Lower leg right: Good, Lower leg left: Good, Right foot: Adequate, Left foot: Adequate
FRONTAL IMPACT
14.9 pts
Head: Good, Chest: Good, Abdomen: Good, Pelvis: Good
SIDE IMPACT CAR
8.0 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
6.8 pts
Neck: Marginal

Total 37 pts | 75%
PERFORMANCE
11.7 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
18 month old child
RestraintBritax Romer Baby Safe
Group0, 0+
FacingRearward
InstallationAdult seatbelt

PERFORMANCE
4.9 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
3 year old child
RestraintBritax Romer Duo Plus
Group1
FacingForward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and top tether

VECHICLE BASED ASSESSMENT
8.0 pts
See comments
Total 25 pts | 69%
Pedestrian protection

HEAD
18.8 pts
PELVIS
0.0 pts
LEG
6.0 pts


Total 6 pts | 86%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.0 pts
- Not available
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
3.0 pts
- Standard
SEATBELT REMINDER
3.0 pts
- driver
- passenger
- rear


Details of tested car

Specifications
Tested model Toyota Verso, 2.0 D-4D mid grade, LHD
Body type 5 door MPV
Year of publication 2010
Kerb weight 1540kg
VIN from which rating applies Applies to all applies Versos of the specification tested
Class SMALL MPV
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag


Comments

Adult occupant
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs. Toyota were able to demonstrate that a simiar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The car scored maximum points in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on rib defelections measured by the dummy. Protection of the neck against whiplash injuries in a rear collision was also rated as marginal.

Child occupant
The head of the 3 year dummy moved forward beyond the recommened limit in the frontal impact, potentially allowing contact with parts of the car's interior. However, the dummy was not ejected from the restraint and, in the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummy were properly contained by their respective seats. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing resrtraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. A permanent label clearly warns of the dangers of using that seating position for a rearward facing child seat without first disabling the airbag.

Pedestrian
The Verso scored well for pedestrian protection. The bumper scored maximum points for protection of pedestrians' legs. The protection provided by the bonnet was good in most areas likely to be struck by an adult or a child. However, the car scored no points for the protection offered by the front edge of the bonnet.

Safety assist
Eletronic stability control is standard equipment on all variants of the Verso. A seatbelt reminder system is also standard, covering the front and rear seats.

EURO NCAP | 2 PLACE DU LUXEMBOURG, 1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | +32 2 400 77 40 | +32 2 400 77 41   CONTACT US