SEARCH:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke 1.6 Acenta, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST


 

Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke 1.6 Acenta, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST
Total 31 pts | 87%
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Marginal, Upper leg left: Adequate, Lower leg right: Adequate, Lower leg left: Good, Right foot: Good, Left foot: Good
FRONTAL IMPACT
13.7 pts
Head: Good, Chest: Adequate, Abdomen: Good, Pelvis: Good
SIDE IMPACT CAR
7.7 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
7.4 pts
Neck: Marginal

Total 40 pts | 81%
PERFORMANCE
10.7 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
18 month old child
RestraintFAIR BIMBOFIX G0/1S
Group0, 0+
FacingRearward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and support frame

PERFORMANCE
12.0 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
3 year old child
RestraintRÖMER BRITAX DUO+
Group1
FacingForward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and top tether

VECHICLE BASED ASSESSMENT
5.0 pts
See comments
Total 15 pts | 41%
Pedestrian protection

HEAD
9.5 pts
PELVIS
0.8 pts
LEG
4.4 pts


Total 5 pts | 71%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.0 pts
Active
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
3.0 pts
ESP
Pass
SEATBELT REMINDER
2.0 pts
driver
Pass
passenger
Pass
rear
Translation not found


Details of tested car

Specifications
Tested model Nissan Juke 1.6 Acenta, LHD
Body type 5 door hatchback
Year of publication 2011
Kerb weight 1172kg
VIN from which rating applies Applies to all applies Jukes of the specification tested
Class Supermini.
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Electronic Stability Control
Seatbelt Reminder driver and front passenger seats


Comments

Adult occupant
The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal impact and rearward movement of the steering wheel movement was small. Measurements in the dummies' knees and femurs did not indicate a problem but, on both the driver and passenger side, structures in the dashboard were considered to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Accordingly, protection in this area was rated as marginal. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was also rated as marginal.

Child occupant
The Juke scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year old dummy in the dynamic tests. Movement of both child’s heads was controlled in the frontal impact and side barrier test. The front seat passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The dangers of using a rearward facing seat in that seat without first disabling the airbag were clearly explained and permanently visible on the sun visor in the appropriate European languages.

Pedestrian
The bonnet provided good protection in most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, but was almost completely poor in those areas where an adult’s head would hit. The front edge of the bonnet also offered poor protection in almost every area tested.

Safety assist
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Juke, as is a seatbelt reminder for the driver and front seat passenger seating positions. Both of which met the Euro NCAP requirements. A driver-set speed limitation device did not qualify for assessment as it is available only as an option.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACT