TEST RESULTS

Total 28 pts | 77%
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Adequate, Upper leg left: Marginal, Lower leg right: Good, Lower leg left: Good, Right foot: Adequate, Left foot: Adequate
FRONTAL IMPACT
12.3 pts
Head: Good, Chest: Adequate, Abdomen: Good, Pelvis: Good
SIDE IMPACT CAR
7.7 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
5.6 pts
Neck: Marginal

Total 40 pts | 81%
PERFORMANCE
11.9 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
18 month old child
RestraintBritax Romer Duo ISOFIX Plus
Group0, 0+
FacingRearward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and support frame

PERFORMANCE
12.0 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
3 year old child
RestraintBritax Romer Duo Plus
Group1
FacingForward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and top tether

VECHICLE BASED ASSESSMENT
4.0 pts
See comments
Total 18 pts | 49%
Pedestrian protection

HEAD
10.1 pts
PELVIS
1.5 pts
LEG
6.0 pts


Total 5 pts | 71%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.0 pts
- not available
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
3.0 pts
- standard
SEATBELT REMINDER
2.0 pts
- driver
- passenger


Details of tested car

Specifications
Tested model Mazda 6 2.0 petrol Exclusive/Active/TS, RHD
Body type 5 door hatchback
Year of publication 2009
Kerb weight 1424kg
VIN from which rating applies JMZGH14F601153165
Seat tested Standard, cloth trim
Class LARGE FAMILY
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag single stage
Front passenger frontal airbag single stage
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Driver knee airbag


Comments

Adult occupant
In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable despite some separation of the facia cross-beam from the A-pillar. The steering column, the column shroud and the facia in the region of the centre console posed a potential threat of injury to the driver's knees as did the glove box lid to the passenger.
Protection of the chest in the side pole impact was rated as poor, owing to the extent to which the ribs were deflected. In the side impact, the car provided adequate protection to the chest and good protection to the other body areas assessed.
Protection against whiplash injury was rated as marginal.

Child occupant
The Mazda 6 scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year old, based on the dummy responses in the dynamic tests and lost only a fraction of a point for the 1½ year old. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver about the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats was not clearly marked.

Pedestrian
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. The bonnet surface provided mostly poor protection in the area where an adult's head might hit and marginal protection in most of the areas likely to be struck by a child's head.

Safety assist
Electronic Stability Control is fitted as standard equipment on all variants in all countries. The Mazda 6 has a seatbelt reminder system for the driver, passenger and rear seats. However, the system for the rear seats did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements so the car was rewarded for the driver and passenger positions only.

EURO NCAP | 2 PLACE DU LUXEMBOURG, 1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM | +32 2 400 77 40 | +32 2 400 77 41
  CONTACT US