SEARCH:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Landwind CV9

Landwind CV9 2.0, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST


 

Landwind CV9

Landwind CV9 2.0, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST
Total 12 pts | 34%
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Marginal, Upper leg right: Marginal, Upper leg left: Marginal, Lower leg right: Adequate, Lower leg left: Good, Right foot: Marginal, Left foot: Marginal
FRONTAL IMPACT
9.0 pts
Head: Good, Chest: Weak, Abdomen: Marginal, Pelvis: Good
SIDE IMPACT CAR
3.4 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
0.0 pts

Total 22 pts | 45%
PERFORMANCE
11.1 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
0.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
18 month old child
RestraintMaxi Cosi Pebble
Group0, 0+
FacingRearward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and support frame

PERFORMANCE
7.1 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
0.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
3 year old child
RestraintMaxi Cosi Pearl
Group1
FacingForward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and support frame

VECHICLE BASED ASSESSMENT
0.0 pts
See comments
Total 11 pts | 31%
Pedestrian protection

HEAD
7.4 pts
PELVIS
0.0 pts
LEG
3.9 pts


Total 2 pts | 29%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.0 pts
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
0.0 pts
SEATBELT REMINDER
2.0 pts
driver
passenger
0


Details of tested car

Specifications
Tested model Landwind CV9 2.0, LHD
Body type 5 door MPV
Year of publication 2010
Kerb weight 1420kg
VIN from which rating applies See comments.
Class SMALL MPV
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag single stage
Front passenger frontal airbag single stage


Comments

The CV9 is not currently available in Europe although customer orders are being taken and the first cars will arrive soon. The vehicles tested by Euro NCAP were early examples of European cars. Euro NCAP understands that Landwind intends to import vehicles of this specification into Europe in early 2011.

Adult occupant
Inspection of the vehicle after the frontal impact, and examination of its performance during the test itself, revealed that structures surrounding the passenger compartment were at the limit of their load-bearing capacity. As a result, the passenger compartment was deemed to be unstable as an impact at a higher speed was expected to lead to significantly greater collapse. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the front seat occupants' knees and femurs. However, structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions, and protection was rated as marginal. The steering rack was pushed rearwards during the frontal test, heavily distorting the driver's footwell and tearing the metal. This represented a risk of injury to the driver's feet and ankles and the car was penalised. The CV9 has no side protection airbags and, in the side barrier test, protection of the chest area was rated as weak and that of the abdomen as marginal. In that test, three doors were seen to have opened during the impact. Landwind have attributed this to weak springs in the door latches and intend to fit stiffer springs to try to overcome the problem in future vehicles. As the car has no head protection device, no side pole test was performed. The seats supplied for whiplash tests were not consistent with the ones in the test vehicles. As the seats in the test cars were damaged from the full scale tests, no valid assessment could be made of the whiplash protection offered by the CV9.

Child occupant
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, exceeded recommended limits. However, in the side barrier test, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position and the label warning of the dangers of doing so was unclear and not permanently attached. Markings on the restraints of both dummies were not permanently attached and points were lost.

Pedestrian
The protection offered by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in places and poor in others. The front edge of the bonnet offered poor protection and scored no points in Euro NCAP's tests. Tests in some areas at the centre of the bonnet indicated good protection for a child's head but was poor elsewhere. The protection offered to the head of a struck adult was also predominantly poor.

Safety assist
A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the driver and front passenger seats. Electronic stability control is not currently available on the CV9.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACT