
The passenger compartment of the Discovery remained stable in the frontal offset test. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Â Land Rover showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Â There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from 'bottoming out' against the steering wheel, and the car was penalised for this. Â In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Â Readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection for this body area, with good protection of all others. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body regions in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact. Â However, in the barrier test, the driver's door became unlatched and the car was penalised. Â Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. Â However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. Â The Discovery has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. Â In tests of its low-speed functionality, the system performed well with impacts avoided up to 35km/h and the impact speed reduced up to 50km/h.
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy. Â Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. Â In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was rated as good and maximum points were scored. Â The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Â Clear information is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. Â Most of the restraint types for which the Discovery is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at most test locations, with some poor results recorded along the front edge of the bonnet. Â The protection offered by pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good and maximum points were scored. Â Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with some good and some poor areas. Â The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests of its pedestrian protection, with complete avoidance of the target up to 40km/h and adequate speed mitigation thereafter.
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. Â A lane departure warning system is fitted as standard equipment, as is a driver-set speed limiter. Â A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment on all seating positions including, if fitted, the optional third row seats.
The passenger compartment of the Discovery remained stable in the frontal offset test. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Â Land Rover showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Â There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from 'bottoming out' against the steering wheel, and the car was penalised for this. Â In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Â Readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection for this body area, with good protection of all others. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body regions in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact. Â However, in the barrier test, the driver's door became unlatched and the car was penalised. Â Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. Â However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. Â The Discovery has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. Â In tests of its low-speed functionality, the system performed well with impacts avoided up to 35km/h and the impact speed reduced up to 50km/h.
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy. Â Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. Â In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was rated as good and maximum points were scored. Â The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Â Clear information is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. Â Most of the restraint types for which the Discovery is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at most test locations, with some poor results recorded along the front edge of the bonnet. Â The protection offered by pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good and maximum points were scored. Â Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with some good and some poor areas. Â The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests of its pedestrian protection, with complete avoidance of the target up to 40km/h and adequate speed mitigation thereafter.
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. Â A lane departure warning system is fitted as standard equipment, as is a driver-set speed limiter. Â A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment on all seating positions including, if fitted, the optional third row seats.


The passenger compartment of the Discovery remained stable in the frontal offset test. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Â Land Rover showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Â There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from 'bottoming out' against the steering wheel, and the car was penalised for this. Â In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Â Readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection for this body area, with good protection of all others. Â Dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body regions in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact. Â However, in the barrier test, the driver's door became unlatched and the car was penalised. Â Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. Â However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. Â The Discovery has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. Â In tests of its low-speed functionality, the system performed well with impacts avoided up to 35km/h and the impact speed reduced up to 50km/h.
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy. Â Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. Â In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was rated as good and maximum points were scored. Â The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Â Clear information is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. Â Most of the restraint types for which the Discovery is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at most test locations, with some poor results recorded along the front edge of the bonnet. Â The protection offered by pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good and maximum points were scored. Â Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with some good and some poor areas. Â The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests of its pedestrian protection, with complete avoidance of the target up to 40km/h and adequate speed mitigation thereafter.
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. Â A lane departure warning system is fitted as standard equipment, as is a driver-set speed limiter. Â A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment on all seating positions including, if fitted, the optional third row seats.
| Offset Deformable Barrier | Full Width Rigid Barrier |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Side Mobile Barrier | Side Pole |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Rear Seat | Front Seat |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
Frontal Impact - 13.6 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix XP Restraint for 10 year old child: Graco Booster Basic | ![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix XP Restraint for 10 year old child: Graco Booster Basic |
Equipment | Front passenger | Row 2 outboard | Row 2 center | Row 3 outboard |
Isofix | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated CRS |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
![]() |
![]()
|
System Name | |
Speed Limit Info Function | NA |
Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection |
System Name | Lane Keeping Aid |
System Type | Lane Departure Warning |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 50km/h |
System Name | Autonomous Emergency Braking |
Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake |
Operational From | km/h |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Approaching a stationary car | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | ||
Approaching a braking car |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | |||
Side Chest Airbag | |||
Side Pelvis Airbag | |||
Centre Airbag |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | ||
i-Size | ||
Integrated Child Seat | ||
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | ||
Child Presence Detection |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year


Date | Event | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
2017-03-01 | Rating Published | ||
2018-03-09 | Annual Review | ||
2019-03-09 | Annual Review | ||
2020-03-13 | Annual Review | ||
2021-03-10 | Facelift Review | ||
2021-12-22 | Annual Review | ||
2024-01-01 | Rating Expired |
Date | Event | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
2017-03-01 | Rating Published | ||
2018-03-09 | Annual Review | ||
2019-03-09 | Annual Review | ||
2020-03-13 | Annual Review | ||
2021-03-10 | Facelift Review | ||
2021-12-22 | Annual Review | ||
2024-01-01 | Rating Expired |
Body type | Variant description | Drivetrain | Rating applies LHD | Rating applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
door SUV | 3.0 petrol V6, 8 speed auto with single/double transfer box - Land Rover Discovery | 4x4 | ||
door SUV | 3.0 diesel I6, 8 speed auto with single/double transfer box - Land Rover Discovery | 4x4 | ||
door SUV | 3.0 diesel V6, 8 speed auto with single/double transfer box - Land Rover Discovery | 4x4 | ||
door SUV | 3.0 petrol I6, 8 speed auto with single/double transfer box - Land Rover Discovery | 4x4 | ||
door SUV | 2.0 diesel I4 (180PS or 240PS), 8 speed auto with single/double transfer box - Land Rover Discovery* | 4x4 |