How safe is your car ?

Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.

OR
OR
All results & rewards
Menu
With safety pack
With standard equipment
  • With standard equipment
  • With safety pack
Share this on:
Publication: March 2017
  • Adult Occupant

    73%
    See More
  • Child Occupant

    61%
    See More
  • Pedestrian

    57%
    See More
  • Safety Assist

    29%
    See More
Total 27.8 Pts / 73%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
6 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Frontal Full Width
3.7 Pts
Rear Passenger
Driver
Lateral Impact
16 Pts
Car
Pole
Whiplash Rear Impact
2.1 Pts
Front Seat
Rear Seat
AEB City
0 Pts
Performance:
Not Available

Comments
Total 30.0 Pts / 61%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children 15.4 Pts
Frontal Impact
7.4 Pts
Lateral Impact
8 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child: Römer KidFix XP
Restraint for 10 year old child: Graco Junior III
Safety Features 5 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
CRS Installation Check 9.7 Pts
crs
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
Seat Position
Front 2nd row
Passenger Left center Right
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize)
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize)
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX)
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX)
Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt)
Römer King II LS (Belt)
Römer KidFix XP (Belt)
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
Detailed Test Results
Comments
Total 24.3 Pts / 57%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Pedestrian Protection
24.3 Pts
Pedestrian Protection

Head Impact 15.8 Pts

Pelvis Impact 2.5 Pts

Leg Impact 6 Pts

AEB Pedestrian 0 Pts
Comments
Total 3.5 Pts / 29%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Speed Assistance 1.5 Pts
System Name Speed Limiter
Warning Function Manually set
Speed Limitation Function Manually set (accurate to 5km/h)
Seat Belt Reminder 2 Pts
Applies To Front seats
Warning Driver Seat front passenger(s) rear passenger(s)
Visual
Audible
  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available
Lane Support 0 Pts
Operational From 0 km/h
Performance
LDW Confirmation Test
Fail
Comments
  • Specifications
  • Safety Equipment
  • Videos
  • Rating Validity

Specifications

Tested Model Ford Ka+ 1.2, LHD

Body Type - 5 door hatchback

Year Of Publication 2017

Kerb Weight 1059kg

VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Ka+

Class Supermini

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Integrated Child Seat
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seat Belt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB City
AEB Inter-urban
AEB Inter-urban
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Lane Assist System

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Videos

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Body TypeEngine & TransmissionDrivetrainRating Applies
      LHD RHD
5 door hatchback* 1.2 Manual 4x2 (FWD)  
yes
 
yes

* Tested variant

Annual Reviews and Facelifts

Date
Event
Outcome
March 2017
Rating Published
2017


Share

Subscribe to our newsletter